What personal responsibility does the governor have in creating our current stress?

“There’s more stress in our state in our country that I think any of us have ever seen. This is exactly not the time to be going after each other. The stress levels are overwhelming. I get it.” – Governor Murphy’s comment this week in response to a foul-mouthed Trump supporter abusing his family at an outdoor restaurant last week. Despite our state’s many difficulties and his failings and the loud criticism by this crowd, Governor Murphy maintains the highest level of support of any governor in memory. He’s obviously way more popular and more trusted than our last governor who had less than half the voter approval rating. Even president Trump has spoken highly of our governor this year and we know that’s rare for any Democrat. But what does any of this mean to us locally? Here at Money Island, we faced extreme government-created stress long before the pandemic.

Friends know, although I don’t speak of it much publicly, that the limited information I have is that Governor Murphy personally declined to get involved in the litigation by the State of New Jersey against me on the Money Island issue. My information comes through our government relations liaison who is, frankly, the only person I know with personal connections and access to that level of state government. Becasue of the sensitive nature of these relationships, the information I get is always vague. I would never hear, for example, that “on (specific date) (specific person) said (specific quote). I would only hear a sanitized version of a meeting or phone conversation. I was aware that Money Island issues were usually tacked onto discussions and meetings on other matters since we are not a big enough issue to warrant our own communications in Trenton. In that 2018 case against us the state wasted years and countless dollars pursuing a case in New Jersey Superior Court that they could not possibly win, was poorly advised, was opposed by local governemnt, was based on inaccurate case information, and that cost me dearly in health and money. There were viable paths forward outside of litigation yet the information I received in May 2018 was that Governor Murphy personally declined to get involved. That was a bad decision that proved so over time. The state has since dropped the case after wasting time and massive resources that could have been used to solve our problems.

I have no specific information that the Governor or the Attorney General was involved in any decisions. When I did receive information attributable to a specific person in Trenton, the name was always removed. My attempts to identify persons in state government for personal accountability were always unsuccessful. From the early efforts of a low level person to solicit bribes to the high level persons who met with our liaison, I do not have any names.

But from May 2018 until June 2020 the meritless legal case dragged on against us. Based on the very little information I have, I would hold the governor personally responsible for our current state of stress and depression that we all feel now at Money Island.

Who is John Galt?

I am re-reading “Atlas Shrugged” in hopes of gaining new perspective a world that makes less sense to me day by day. I am committed to hearing different voices. I know that I will show respect and will learn from the majority of my neighbors at the bayshore who see the world very differently than I do. I make this commitment knowing that many disagree with the approach. My interest is self-serving. I am interested in working together to build efficiency and my own effectiveness. I know that collaberation among people with different skills and resources is the very sign of intelligence. I am also interested in learning about myself. I want to know how did this happen? Why are the things so clear to me invisible to others and vice versa? Why are so many unwilling to even discuss the data of our world even when confronted with their lack of logic? Today, exactly three weeks after our national election, I see nine of my neighbors flying “Trump 2020 No more bullshit” banners. I am accustomed to attribute this behavior to some type of fluid mental illness stress response but I’ve not learned how to think about this worldly thinking that is adapted by half the population.

Tonight I listened to the TED talk of Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya about fearlessness in the face of authoritarianism. Meanwhile, earlier today a long time friend said that he concludes that he will die soon on the day when Biden comes to take his guns. The irony is apparent; my attempt to use intellectual analysis on a situation that defies and revolts against this very same cognitive process. Having a conversation with a person not living in the same platform of reality is shocking. Knowing that he lives in a world where virtually all share his alternate reality is mind-boggling. The obvious difference in where this difference leads us: peaceful protest vs. armed revolution is the thing that most immediately jumps out.

Also today I spoke with two visionaries – people far more successful in business leadership than I’ve been able to demonstrate – two both see great opportunity ahead and are not deterred by the craziness in the world.

The thing I’ve learned so far actually caught me by complete surprise. I am looking to understand change in the world but what I’ve learned instead is the change within me. We are the change. We are John Galt.

Stay tuned for more change ahead.

The Power of Government Lawyers

Today’s news carries reports about president Trump switching to a team of government lawyers to defend him in an active rape case. I feel bad for the rape victim. I found out firsthand how difficult it is when corrupt politicians use government lawyers against you in a case a few years ago “State of New Jersey vs. Tony Novak et. al”. It is simply overpoweringly. Even if the government attorneys are ethical, they are working for criminals and presenting faulty evidence derived by criminals for political gain.

In my experience, the Attorney General whose name appeared on the docket was probably not even familiar with the facts of the case. He assigns staff lawyers who have no choice but to represent the government whether government is at fault or not. An individual citizen on the other side of the legal case cannot compete in the courtroom packed with highly paid government lawyers. This appears likely to be the case in this Trump rape case where the evidence against him is developing in court but the rapist is now being defended by government lawyers.

In my case, the criminals in government were protected from even being identified and questioned and were not even investigated as far as I know. The government lawyers eventually had to give up their case against me and my family when they realized they could not win. But in both legal cases the taxpayers will pay a huge price to protect corrupt government officials. This is plainly wrong but I realize there is nothing that we as citizens can do to fight this corrupt government practice. Government corruption using the court system as a method to ‘strong arm’ individuals is always a risk to those who challenge powerful politicians.

Four years after storm Jonas

This week marks four years since winter storm Jonas that brought the most severe flooding in New Jersey in our lifetime. I’ve read anecdotal comments that New York City was “shut down”, and that almost all of Ocean City was flooded.

Here at Money Island almost all of our land was underwater on January 23, 2016. The depth of water at our highest points was astounding. Our marina work truck, a 1984 Ford 350, was parked just outside Bruce’s trailer. It barely escaped being ruined. My elevated tool shed flooded for the first time and so I elevated it further and built an access ramp the following spring.

We know that it will happen again. I feel a little better prepared each time. We still have preparations to make: a ramp of last resort and more elevated vehicle parking. Yet I have the confidence to say that storm flooding will not be a major impediment to the sustainability of Money Island for the remainder of my life. The only real threat remaining after the removal of the majority of residents is government. Government’s actions or inactions in preserving the road and litigating again property owners of partially flooded lots will determine our future.

No people

I am planning a meeting with a regional business incubator next week. One main point to convey is that one of our main challenges at the bayshore is a lack of people. Because of their setup, they should have access to a much larger human resource market.

I’ve been counting the cars at Money Island lately. Now that a few more neighbors have moved out we are down to only about one car per day on a weekday and 3-4 on weekends along the western coastline.

This photo was taken it fall. It looks much less colorful now.

Aquaculture crawls forward

It was a busy week at Money Island but that doesn’t mean that an outcome is any more clear. I see competing and conflicting interests that will eventually clash. Meanwhile, I head two independent confirmations of ongoing investment here.

The state is planning more oyster aquaculture training in Trenton in early 2020. I was asked to help prepare an invitation list.

One local business wants to expand crabbing and processing here again. I agreed to help with the marketing, but had a conversation with Division of Fish and Wildlife to avoid being caught in our antiquated laws again. Current law says that a marketing consultant can be prosecuted for not having fisheries industry catch records, even if the marketer did not sell any product.

Meanwhile, roadway erosion control work continues, but apparently not in coordination with the oyster industry. This just seems odd and inefficient.

Finding a new strategic plan

In this first week of December I am settling into a regular pattern again after a month of chaos from the move. Not that the chaos is ended, it just that I can clear a half day now to focus on strategic goals.

The immediate plan is to meet and interview people in my new hometown. I’m focused on identifying people who are aware that they can make a difference in the future of their community. What I’m finding, so far, is that I need a more effective approach to convince them to break their routine and talk with me.

Also, Sebastian, my business coach, alerted me this week that my interview technique is pretty much terrible. I figure it will improve with learning and experience; mostly the latter.

Overall, I’m not happy with the pace of this project and today thinking about how I can ‘pick up the pace’. That phrase immediately triggers thoughts of college coaching when that same phrase was used again and again to propel our wrestlers to higher levels of performance. It was clearly a Pavlovian response and appears to still be powerful with me today. It worked once to raise our performance to record setting national championships. Can I harness that power again?

At this point the four step objective of this project is clear:

1. Meet the influentials.

2. Ask about their priorities and goals.

3. Learn about their recent successes and make note of the techniques.

4. Ask about their ongoing struggles, unmet needs and look for patterns that might indicate opportunities for new economic solutions.

Once I’ve collected feedback from at least a dozen people then I will be in a better position to take the next steps to develop a new business plan for myself.

Which door leads to the best path forward?

Sometimes you just gotta do what’s right (update on environmental activism at the bayshore)

“Sometimes you just gotta do what’s right inside and hope that maybe the rest of the world will come around to it. And maybe they will and maybe they won’t, but the truth is, you gotta take care of yourself first,“ – Elizabeth Warren, talking about her own life at a campaign rally, December 1, 2019. Perhaps the strongest statement made in this campaign to date.

Today I finished paying off my legal costs resulting from environmental justice activism in rural southwest New Jersey over this past year. It’s been financially devastating; the lawyers’ costs, court costs, fines. Some, including a judge, have admonished me to keep quiet and stay offline with my social media projects. We are aware that government trolls this web site and presumably all of my activism. The prosecutor for the New Jersey Attorney General said “stop breaking the law” as if I had personally created any of the disasters we face today. The past president of the New Jersey Society of Certified Public Accountants wrote today in reply to my latest editorial “Come on man!”, apparently ignorant of the real life challenges we face as a result of systematic discrimination under the status quo. A New Jersey elected official threatened me at a public meeting in response to a published editorial critical of government a few months ago.

These comments from prominent community members tell me that they have no clue that this is only the beginning of a movement of peaceful lawbreaking protests against environmental injustice against so many in the lower echelon of the economy. No matter what the cost, backing down, keeping quiet and following the law is not an option. State governments will continue to increase prosecutions against environmental activists, whether they are marching in the street like these protestorsor trying to develop sustainable rural communities like me.

To add insult to injury, there is no indication that any of my attention-getting efforts have resulted in any form of economic development or new opportunities for our community. Nobody I know, from our local Cumberland County elected leaders (Derella and other freeholders) all the way up to the governor’s office, has a viable plan to address continued environmental injustice issues here at the bayshore1, 2. It’s just outside of their scope. Local mayors and business leaders do have viable ideas but lack the financial clout to get it done. My support of a proposed New Jersey State bank drew much criticism lately; many (mostly Republicans) are opposed to the wealth treasure mechanism that moves investment capital to riskier but socially supported projects.

In the end, I just have to do what I know is right, and hope that the rest of the world comes around to it. At this time, it’s the only ethical option.

Tony Novak, environmental activist with Baysave, the target of multiple New Jersey prosecutions in 2019


Footnotes:

1Governor Murphy launched an environmental justice exploratory project by executive order in early 2019 I’ve entered written and oral public testimony as part of that project (covered in my other blogs) and I made multiple requests for follow-up conversation but have had no response to my communications.

2People often suggest approaching federal government with environmental justice concerns. I do maintain good working relationships with our current (VanDrew) and former (LoBiondo) Congressman and both US Senators (Booker and Menendez), both individually and through grassroots PACs. But I find that the federal government has relatively little role in the environmental justice issues that affect us locally. These are primarily state government controlled issues.

Why New Jersey aquaculture is stalled

New Jersey aquaculture

Doing some late night browsing I noticed some news from other states on progress in aquaculture projects in other locations and confirming my observation that New Jersey’s aquaculture development is stalled. The industry appears to be moving ahead in virtually every other seaboard state, including Delaware to our south and New York to our north.

In fact, there has been no substantive progress in fish farming here in New Jersey since the publication of the state’s “Guide to Developing Aquaculture in New Jersey” in 2003. Shellfish farming has advanced at the eastern shore but is monopolized and strangled by the political process here on the bayshore.

Current NJ aquatic farmer license

Since I first became a licensed NJ aquatic farmer in 2012, the state of New Jersey has taken these specific actions to stall our aquaculture business at Money Island:

  1. Failed to implement license transfer procedures approved by the state legislature that would allow idle fishing licenses to be transferred to another person.
  2. Failed to issue a crab harvesters license to anyone associated with our landing port.
  3. Shut down community-based oyster gardening programs that are thriving in other states to raise public awareness and support of shellfish sustainability.
  4. Closed most of the commercial docks by court order.
  5. Denied Sandy recovery funding.
  6. Sued for land use permits missing since the 1970s.
  7. Published a deliberately false water quality report even after its author admitted to its faults.
  8. Denied a NJ SeaGrant wastewater processing permit application.
  9. Denied a Zane land use application for redevelopment of the aquaculture center infrastructure.
  10. Closed the community’s only public toilet facility (forcing visitors to go in the bushes; a practice unsafe and incompatible to aquaculture).
  11. Denied a major seafood company’s pre-permit request for site review for a new aquaculture facility.
  12. Closed the crab shedding business by court order.
  13. Prosecuted me for the new aquaculture association’s online marketing program despite me having no personal connection with crab sales.
  14. Prosecuted me for stolen fishing equipment that was discovered more than a year later to be used illegally despite me having no connection with the equipment after the reported theft.

In short, the state has done just about everything possible to cause our aquaculture industry to fail, yet the watermen here persist and continue to push forward.

Money Island is the state’s second most productive seafood landing port. This year the investment in commercial infrastructure has growing at an unprecedented pace. Seafood landings are increasing. Commercial docks prices are rising. The number employed here has increased. Yet state government appears to be determined to do everything in its power to destroy the local aquaculture economy.

I’ve personally met or talked with lawmakers at all levels: Senator Booker, Senator Menendez, former Congressman LoBiondo, Congressman and former State Senator Van Drew, State Senator Andrzejczak, Assemblyman Land, several former state senators, most of our county freeholders, our county economic development officer, our local mayor and a fisheries industry consultant. All agree that the number of people inside NJ state government opposed to our aquaculture plans is small. We recognize that just a handful of bureaucratic naysayers is holding us back. Most acknowledge that they are aware that the state is using false information and sometimes even illegal tactics to stall local aquaculture. Yet I don’t sense that anyone has a plan to deal with these state government destructive forces.

Earlier this year, a trusted business associate told me that he was in recent personal contact with the Governor’s office to discuss this aquaculture problem that was holding up his company’s infrastructure investments. He was told that the Governor’s Office decided to not get involved with these matters that fall under the direction of the NJDEP’s Catherine McCabe. McCabe has visited Money Island recently, but she never stopped at the office nor has she responded to my calls.

Local mayor Bob Campbell and former Congressman Frank LoBiondo visiting Money Island.

Perhaps the most chilling memory of dealing with this problem is a one-one-one conversation I had with former Congressman Frank LoBiondo outside of our business. He had taken a tour of our living shoreline stabilization projects at Money Island and was waiting for a driver to pick him up. I had spoken with the Congressman before, both here in NJ and in his DC office. He was always formal and expressed restrained support under the circumstances. But on this day we had a few rare quiet minutes to talk alone with nobody else around. It was the most honest conversation I’ve ever had with a politician. I echoed my frustrations as listed above. He said “It’s the DEP, right?” He shook his head. “I hear it again and again. We’ve been unable to make any progress”. As I walked back include after he left, my heart sank. If he couldn’t make any progress with the state bureaucracy – even as a U.S. Congressman – then what hope did I have of solving these problems?

I have plenty of other ‘almost too hard to believe’ stories of the deliberate stalling of aquaculture here by a few state government officials. I hope that eventually I’ll be able to record those details in this blog.

We know that aquaculture industry has a bright future and will thrive in other areas under the spark of large international corporations. But the survival and future of small aquaculture businesses here at Money Island New Jersey remains very much in doubt.